Search for: "P. v. Long" Results 3901 - 3920 of 7,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2011, 3:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
This court overruled that holding in State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Skaist has also been an adjunct professor at Boalt Hall Law School in Berkeley, CA, at Willamette School of Law in Salem, OR, at Lewis and Clark Law School in Portland, OR, and at Albany Law School. [2] A separate twist is raised by Sotomayor’s concurrence (also expressly by Judge Mayer recently in I/P Engine v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm by Andres
v=e_SIeljZ3Tc), initially broadcasted by the BBC on 26 September 2011 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b015flwq), gathers some of these videos which, after their publication online, allowed the international community to realize the revolt on Syrian streets. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:48 am by Ed Felten
Every time you solve a puzzle you will get a Bitcoin whose value in dollars is V. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:38 pm by Douglas
Os rolezinhos provocam pânicos (ou seria terror?) [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:50 am
  In last week's ruling of the ECJ in Case C-552/09 P Ferrero the court referred to two of its earlier decisions, C-398/07 P and C-57/08 P, decided on 7 May 2009 and 11 December 2008 respectively -- and both still unreported]. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 10:57 am
JLARC found no agency specific requirements for the service providers, no minimum qualifications for counselors conducting group therapy and no guidelines outlining the basic elements of therapeutic counseling (p. iv-v). [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Corcoran and Pritchard v Van Nes. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am by INFORRM
[Update] Judgment in Khader v Aziz and Davenport Lyons, heard 19 May 2010 by Sir Anthony May P, Carnwath and Moore-Bick  LJJ will be given on 23 June 2010. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am by INFORRM
Below the passages about the millions and millions of pounds of fees and how they should be met, is a long section of the judgment about transparency. [read post]