Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 3901 - 3920 of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2020, 4:46 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
One of these transitional cases was in R. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:01 am by Stephen Pitel
Starting at para. 93 the court considered whether the claim against the entities being restructured was governed by Canadian or American law (in each case the relevant law was either federal rather than provincial or state or did not vary as between provinces). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:12 am by Christine Sellers
" (Halsbury's ;¶134, 135) In other words, as long as the direct line of John Transome continued, the Durfeys could legally hold Transome Court. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 1:19 am
Some guidance has however been given in Ryanair Ltd v PR Aviation BV (Case C-30/14) and Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort (VG Wort) v Kyocera and others (case 457/11). [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm by Riana Harvey
The GC made references to case law both in favour and against taking into account the time at which the EUIPO gives its decision on the opposition - in essence, querying whether the fact that an earlier sign (with an earlier right) could lose such status at a later date (e.g. following the possible withdrawal of a Member State in which the mark enjoys protection) would affect the outcome of the case (see by analogy T-598/18 Grupo Brownie decision, para 19).The GC stated… [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:03 am
Saco, El secreto del éxito del Perú en el CIADI: destruyendo el paradigma de que el sistema de solución de diferencias inversionista-Estado es peligroso para los países en desarrollo – The secret of Peru’s success before the ICSID: dispelling the idea that the investor-State dispute settlement system is a danger for developing countries J.P. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
He cited two court decisions touching on this issue — Chrysler Corp and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal’s 1981 decision in Liberty Mutual Insurance Co v Friedman (24 EPD 31,457). [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 2:57 am
Case Name: Williams Production RMT Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
This is a departure from the standard provisions required by CPR Practice Direction 25(a) in para.5.1(2). [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:44 am
This morning he released his Opinion in Case C-441/13 Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH [available in, amongst others, Italian but not English!] [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]