Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 3901 - 3920 of 5,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2018, 5:55 am by Andrew Appel
  If people can’t understand something, how can they trust it? [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am by David Kravets
“The point of copyright protection is to encourage people to create things that will ultimately belong to the public. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Apotex case Monday, case summary and webcast to listen http://t.co/f1KeAesP3r -> NZ global mode ISPs to be sued for copyright infringement http://t.co/zcaAS2IQMu -> Pirate Bay Co-Founder Unable To Experience The Joys Of NES Behind Bars http://t.co/SBGsRgVgFl -> Record Labels Accuse YouTube Of Causing Them To Lose Money http://t.co/mqHp07gxzz -> HBO Criticizes Periscope Over 'Game of Thrones' Live Streams, Issues Take-Down Notices http://t.co/CMoO1BtgMi -> Proposed new… [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm by Russell Knight
Few people are going to announce to the world that they got a sexually transmitted disease just so their former partner can get a $ 500 fine and community service. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am by Jason A. Weis, Esq.
Pursuant to §18.2-365, adultery is a class 4 misdemeanor, meaning the maximum penalty is a $250 fine. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am by admin
Pursuant to §18.2-365, adultery is a class 4 misdemeanor, meaning the maximum penalty is a $250 fine. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
GB News fired host Laurence Fox after more than 8,800 people complained to Ofcom about derogatory remarks he made about a female journalist, Ava Evans. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had a piece “Zoom Alternatives: 5 Options For People Who Care About Security And Privacy”. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  We are stuck with design patent law, which expressly requires novelty, originality, though not nonobviousness and which is thus not fine under TRIPs. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Barry Sookman
The “they are doing just fine” argument is really a normative judgment that creators should not have a copyright framework law that will enable them to achieve their full potential – what they could produce and earn but for piracy or uses not paid for. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
This week brought good news for the petitioners’ counsel in a pair of one-time relists – if “lucky” can really be used to describe people who will spend their summer restricted by SCOTUS briefs; deep down, they envy those who retain their freedom. [read post]