Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm
“Yesterday, open statements were heard in the case of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 8:30 am
A summary of the Rogers v Voltage decision is here. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 10:09 am
It lets people settle bets about who acted in what movies and it may be disrupting a certain segment of the casting process in Hollywood. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 2:40 pm
The case of National Business Forms & Printing, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Kahler v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
As the examples illustrate, even people who are normally diligent in inspecting and organizing their possessions may find themselves unexpectedly in violation of this law, and without the notice necessary to defend their rights. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 10:32 am
Addressed in the context of a marihuana (marijuana) sale, In People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:05 am
Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 12:36 pm
Jewell (Land into Trust)Ho-Chunk, INC., v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:34 pm
Stuart v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:58 am
Vagueness may invalidate a criminal law for violating the Fifth Amendment due process protections if it fails “to provide the kind of notice that will enable ordinary people to understand what conduct it prohibits” and/or if it authorizes or encourages “arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:27 am
They may be cited, however, for persuasive value under Fed.R.App.P. 32.1 and 10th Cir.R. 32.1. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Donziger is an extension of the civil RICO case of Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:52 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting decision, in People v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 6:45 am
In Woods v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:43 am
In People v King, the Court of Appeals held that a registered qualifying patient under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA) may only avoid prosecution for cultivating marihuana under § 8 of the Act if he has complied with other applicable sections of the MMMA. [read post]
