Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 3901 - 3920 of 178,381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2016, 10:46 am by ADeStefano
In dismissing plaintiff's Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6) claims, the First Department found that the "tilt" was de minimis, and thus not an elevation-related hazard. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:24 am by Steven M. Sweat
Both sides in the case agreed that the speed of the defendant’s car was no more than 15 mph when it struck the plaintiffs vehicle. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 11:50 pm by Jeanne Huang
However, when determining the plaintiffs application for leave to proceed where no appearance by defendant, Agar says the court should not assess the strength of the plaintiffs claim. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:50 am by Jeanne Huang
However, when determining the plaintiffs application for leave to proceed where no appearance by defendant, Agar says the court should not assess the strength of the plaintiffs claim. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:40 am by Sean Wajert
A federal court in New York last week denied plaintiffs' motion for class certification in a case alleging that the run-flat tires on defendant BMW's MINI Cooper S were defective. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 7:11 pm
  But the oil giant argued that because the majority opinion failed to explicitly address whether the plaintiffs' were entitled to interest, the Court’s own rules require that they can collect none. [read post]
23 May 2022, 2:52 pm by John Stigi and Alejandro Moreno
  In Sirott, the plaintiffs derivative claims were properly ordered dismissed because the plaintiff lacked standing after it lost its interest in the limited liability company—i.e., the real party in interest with respect to the derivative claims. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:05 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
The "eggshell plaintiff" or "eggshell skull" doctrine generally "holds that holds that a defendant’s liability in a tort claim is not mitigated by a plaintiffs unforeseeable, pre-existing susceptibility to injury. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Two former high-ranking public school district employees [Plaintiffs], alleging breach of their employment contract with the school district, appealed a federal district court's granting the Board of Education's motion for summary judgment.*  Plaintiff's contended that the federal district court was incorrect in concluding that they did not possess the contractually requisite certifications for their positions at the time of their… [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Two former high-ranking public school district employees [Plaintiffs], alleging breach of their employment contract with the school district, appealed a federal district court's granting the Board of Education's motion for summary judgment.*  Plaintiff's contended that the federal district court was incorrect in concluding that they did not possess the contractually requisite certifications for their positions at the time of their… [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:35 am by Editorial Board
On May 27, Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the Southern District of New York granted Morgan Stanley’s motion for reconsideration and dismissed as time-barred claims brought by certain named plaintiffs (the New Plaintiffs) first added to the case more than a year after it was originally filed. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:32 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Plaintiffs Right to Amend a Complaint   On appeal, the court discussed the shifting burden of proof in medical malpractice claims, from the defendant, who must establish that there was no deviation from the standard of care or that any deviation was not the cause of the plaintiffs harm, to the plaintiff, who must submit facts or evidence sufficient to refute the defendant’s claims. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 5:01 am by Moll Law Group, Ltd
The judge granted the plaintiff his request for a new trial, but that state’s supreme court reversed the decision. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:22 pm by Seeger Weiss LLP
” More and updated information will be available at the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee negotiation team’s forthcoming website: www.nationalopioidsettlement.com. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Count I of plaintiffs complaint asserted negligence against Green, and Count II asserted negligence against Pan-Oceanic. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:10 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs challenged TDHCA’s allocation of Low Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTC”) in the Dallas metropolitan area. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 9:45 am
Superior Court panel issued a non-precedential opinion that reinstates the jury's verdict in plaintiffs' favor. [read post]