Search for: "Root v. State"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 4,649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
Bell because of a new state law that sharply restricts how they can be paid. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
Moreover, as I noted several years ago in an article on the landmark right of publicity case of Uhleander v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:51 am
Court of Appeals issued a pertinent decision in Herrington v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:10 am
Keays, stated as follows:In order to be entitled to aggravated damages, Ms. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 4:18 pm
524/06 Heinz Huber v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
Specifically, in the 2004 case of Metropolitan Intercollegiate Basketball Ass'n v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
If states want to use impediments to marriage as an entry deterrent, it says, then they must face being rapped with the Article 12 stick. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:35 am
In Bowers v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:11 am
To confidently state “network effects! [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
United States and New York v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm
As noted a few posts down, a prior ban was struck as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:36 am
United States (No. 10-5400). [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 8:28 am
Thus, in reaction to Furman v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 8:10 pm
The case is Tapia v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 2:55 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:25 am
"As stated above, there is no clear law laid down on this point. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:52 am
Com. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532 and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate standard of… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm
Minnesota and New York Times Co. v U.S. [read post]
