Search for: "S. C." Results 3901 - 3920 of 142,021
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 3:19 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
The differences that did exist between Opull’ence’s design, and the prior art were not minor. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:06 am by David Pocklington
 c) At that stage, the objector becomes a registered Objector. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:42 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Texas, Texas is suing the federal government, in tort, for the destruction of state property (c-wire barriers and the like). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
In the Federal Circuit’s view, the PTAB’s decision had “no impact” on this infringement litigation, primarily because the PTAB’s decision was pending on appeal. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Comitz Stanley
Easter submitted an APS from both a Certified Physician’s Assistant (PA-C), Megan Jones, and an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), Megan Sandy. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 7:53 am by Dan Farber
Why is subsection C limited to alternatives consistent with the proposal’s goals, while subsection F apparently requires alternatives to be discussed even if they aren’t consistent with those goals? [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 7:33 am by Odia Kagan
Can’t give it to a search engine operator or social media platform operator without providing to such search engine operator or social media platform operator the technical capability such search engine operator or social media platform operator reasonably requires to perform such search engine operator’s or social media platform operator’s duties. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:18 am by Frank Santoro
[about] managing the activities of daily living,” and (4) “the nature and extent of the person’s property and financial affairs and his or her ability to manage them” (MHL §§ 81.02[c][1], [2], [3], [4]). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:02 am by Alessandro Cerri
 In respect of unfair advantage, the Court noted that, following L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV (C-487/07), what it was concerned with was whether Aldi had attempted to take advantage of, or ride on the coat tails of the Mark, in order to exploit it and gain a benefit from its reputation and Thatchers' marketing efforts which have been made by Thatchers.It would also suffice if the objective effect of Aldi's use was to enable it to benefit from… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
  Notably, the FEPA’s jurisdictional hook is relatively narrow and criminalizes only those acts which involve “use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, from any person . [read post]