Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 3901 - 3920 of 6,064
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 6:54 am by Drew Boortz
  Since trademark licenses generally cannot be assigned without the consent of the licensor (see Miller v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:54 am by Drew Boortz
  Since trademark licenses generally cannot be assigned without the consent of the licensor (see Miller v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Appellate Division Generally Accords Deference to Supreme Court's Determination Regarding Amount and Duration of Maintenance as Long as the Court Considers the Statutory Factors and Provides a Basis for its Conclusion                  In O’Connor v O’Connor, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 88226 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) the parties in this matrimonial action were married in 1986, they had three children (one born in 1990 and twins… [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:04 pm by Editorial Board
Referring to a recent case that upheld the status quo, he stated that more nuanced rules would help judges review Commission penalties (Case C-272/09P KM Europe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:33 pm by Brad Pauley
Superior Court (Santa Clara Partner’s Mortgage), S199613—Depublished Borrowers under a deed of trust sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin the trustee’s sale of their house. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm by Steve Bainbridge
  Let's repeat: "there is no sale or change in control when [c]ontrol of both [companies] remain[s] in a large, fluid, changeable and changing market. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Michael Sirkin
In the latter situation, there is no sale or change in control when [c]ontrol of both [companies] remain[s] in a large, fluid, changeable and changing market. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:01 pm
In the present case the purchase and sale of shares, so as to take long term and short term capital loss was found as a matter of fact by all the three authorities to be a sham. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm by GuestPost
The ‘Junk’ decision in 2005 (C-188/03, Junk v Kuhnel) has meant, that worker consultations need now take place before any final decision on job losses is taken. [read post]