Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 3901 - 3920 of 23,609
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by Terri Nappier
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am by Eric Goldman
Although Smash does not necessarily market to experts in the field, it sells an expensive product to individuals who are likely to conduct research before making a purchase. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 6:33 am by John Jascob
Meanwhile, the corporate defendant has agreed to be subject to a consent order of permanent injunction which includes findings, an order of disgorgement, and penalties totaling $72,600 (CFTC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:42 am by Peter Groves
So I am delighted to be able to say that the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice will soon be publishing a rather insubstantial piece I wrote about that famous copyright case, Glyn v Weston Feature Film Company, in response to the editor's request for pieces on the theme of "Love, passion and ... [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:42 am by Peter Groves
So I am delighted to be able to say that the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice will soon be publishing a rather insubstantial piece I wrote about that famous copyright case, Glyn v Weston Feature Film Company, in response to the editor's request for pieces on the theme of "Love, passion and ... [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:32 pm
It primarily argued that the doctrine of strict products liability, as well as any similar tort theory, did not apply to it because it did not distribute, manufacture, or sell the product in question. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Up until the Court of Appeal decision in Lloyd v Google LLC, many of these key legal issues had still not been fully considered. [read post]