Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 3901 - 3920
of 15,305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:30 am
Professions v State of New York, 2013 NY Slip Op 50084(U), Supreme Court, Albany County A faculty member in the collective bargaining unit represented by United University Professions (UUP) employed by a unit of the State University of New York [SUNY] was suspended without pay pending the resolution of certain charges of misconduct filed against him. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
B/c we live in a democratic society, not b/c we have preferences for news. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
(b) Is the surety’s defense based on the pay-if-paid clauses in the subcontracts between its principal and the claimants barred by K.S.A. 16-1803(c)? [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
§ 2a(b). [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:47 pm
§ 6751(b)(1).. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:22 pm
(c) The state board is authorized to exercise any powers delegated to the state and carry out any program a state is authorized to administer under the [CWA] and any amendments to that act. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:12 am
The judgment of the Court in Weltimmo s.r.o. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság, Case C‑230/14, October 1, 2015 has significant repercussions for EU and non-EU businesses that operate websites that target residents of a Member State and potentially for the territorial reach of the “right to be forgotten”. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 3:42 pm
The appeals court rejected the state’s arguments (a) that the issue had not been preserved, (b) that the prosecutor’s argument was merely a comment on witness credibility, and (c) that in any event the error was harmless. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 7:38 am
In Lou v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 8:23 pm
A Woman’s Friend Pregnancy Resource Clinic v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:21 am
P. 26(b)(2)(C), but does mandate consideration of many of the same factors. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:06 pm
In Temporary Labor Source v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Reed cites a nice example, Schmidberger Internationale v Austria (Case C-112/00) [2003] ECR I-5659. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 3:15 pm
b. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:41 pm
Superior Court upheld the Board's decision [Jackson v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:40 am
OR tax cuts can be offset by (a) real spending cuts; (b) other tax changes or (c) economic growth… It seems that the only way a state could fall afoul of this is if they aggressively cut taxes below the 2019 budget year baseline without taking any offsetting steps or doing so in response to real economic changes. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:16 pm
We do not decide the issue of indirect infringement, under §§ 271(b), (c), and (f), which is not before us. [read post]
