Search for: "State v. Character" Results 3901 - 3920 of 7,502
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
By its own terms, Georgia’s stalking statute “shall not apply to persons engaged in activities protected by the Constitution of the United States or of this state. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:10 pm by Ron Coleman
Co. v Google, Inc., 330 F.Supp.2d 700, 704-705 (E.D. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
In this latter regard, it is worth emphasising that in the contested decisions the Board of Appeal cited Develey ('Plastikflaschenform') T-129/04, paragraph 19,  which stated that… where the Board of Appeal finds that the trade mark sought is devoid of intrinsic distinctive character, it may base its analysis on facts arising from practical experience generally acquired from the marketing of general consumer goods which are likely to be known by anyone… [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:00 am
As long as it is readily identifiable in that search, it appears that this should form part of the CGK.The traditional approachMore fundamentally, the approach in Teva is stated as an updating of traditional guidance from the authorities, but one can question whether those authorities are characterised correctly. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:35 am
  We’re not saying that the plaintiffs and judge in King v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 am by Jeremy
Member States may however allow a work to be used, without its author’s consent, for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Takeda had sought an application stating that Mylan was infringing its patented acid-reflux drug Dexilant [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 5:22 am
State of M.P., AIR 1954 SC 465] and control of import and export [Bhatnagars & Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:16 am
Defendants cited several New York cases to support this claim, such as Costanza v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:11 pm
The case is TPG Arrow Productions, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, it was settled in People v Lawrence that recantation evidence is unreliable. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]