Search for: "State v. Force" Results 3901 - 3920 of 32,528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2022, 7:09 am by Dan Farber
A Ninth Circuit ruling last week in a case involving bear baiting, Safari Club v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 5:47 pm by Professor Alberto Bernabe
State Bar of Cal., 496 U.S. 1 (1990), File maintains that the Court’s more recent cases—particularly Janus v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Meirion Jones, editor of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, revealed last week that The Sun attempted to expose Jimmy Savile as a paedophile in 2008, while he was still alive, but were forced to back down because, in Jones’ words, Britain’s “arcane libel laws protect the wicked. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
  In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 2:11 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The Act includes a preemption provision, providing that “a State, political subdivision of a State, or political authority of at least 2 States may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 11:51 am by Andrew Hamm
The state trial court ruled that McCoy did not fit within the Supreme Court’s exceptions under Teague v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am by Tess Bridgeman
And, if so, what are the limits of action the United States can take against pro-regime forces under its theory of self-defense against IS? [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am by Gus Hurwitz
Circuit in 2010, on grounds that a mere policy statement lacked the force of law. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]