Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 5,191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:48 pm
" That's now two states Supreme Courts now that are making clear that there's got to be good chain of title. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm
Specifically, the court stated that “because the party alleging inequitable conduct bears the burden of proof the patentee need not make any good faith explanation unless the accused infringer first proves a threshold level of intent to deceive. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
All in all, not a good day for Argentina in the courts! [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:16 am
(Eugene Volokh) Today’s Ezell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA and others v eBay International AG and others. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
No dictionaries were harmed (or even mentioned) in the construction of the claims, which can only be a good thing.PriorityMoving, then, to the question of priority (see [303] to [345]), the Judge referred to his own earlier opinion in Intervet UK v Merial [2010] EWHC 294 (Pat), which the parties agreed was an accurate summary of the relevant principles. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:17 am
– (iv) all the rights exclusively to use the designation “FIORUCCI” and exclusively to manufacture and sell the clothes and other goods bearing the name “FIORUCCI”.In December 1997 Edwin applied to register the word mark ELIO FIORUCCI as a Community trade mark; registration was granted in April 1999 and all looked good for the Japanese company until February 2003, when Elio Fiorucci sought revocation and/or a declaration of invalidity. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
See NLRB v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am
Cases of this nature centre on the constitutional right to a fair trial and the recognised garda duty, so far as practicable and necessary, to seek out and preserve evidence having a bearing or potential bearing on the issue of guilt or innocence in a given case. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:36 am
In Liberty Sales Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:14 am
Ultimately, I wish to defend my argument against the charge that it involves the State imposing its own version of the good on its child-citizens. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Goodyear v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
