Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 16,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 1:19 pm
Robert Andrew Sharp v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:19 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Stephens v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:17 am
Davis v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 5:28 am
Garth Meikle v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
(See J.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:00 am
Mueller — — — — — James V. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 12:44 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Mueller 258,875 James V. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:46 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
Such was the case in Kerson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
The state has a list of all registered voters. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:51 am
In the main, they rely on the notion that the Tenth Amendment preserves states' "power to tax all property, business, and persons, within their respective limits," Thomson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:24 pm
But the legal uncertainty changed today when the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:18 am
Sagarra Inversiones, S.L. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:38 am
The case is Health Care Service Corp. v. [read post]
