Search for: "State v. Peoples" Results 3901 - 3920 of 45,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 6:13 am by Ann Caresani
Rejecting actuarial heresy, the United States Supreme Court has refreshingly acknowledged that “People make mistakes. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
It's about setting out the law that governs the people. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 2:56 pm
We agree with defendant insofar as he contends that owning a cassette tape of rap music in general, or of any rap song in particular, is not relevant to the murder charge (see generally United States v McCrea, 583 F2d 1083, 1086). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
State, 388 Md. 446, 879 A.2d 1111 (Maryland Court of Appeals 2005) (download `means to transfer or copy a file’); People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Manheim Township School District * More Teenagers Mistakenly Think “Private” Chat Conversations Will Remain Private–People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:10 pm
"  The only people on the lease are Parents.Eventually, Parents (who are now older) move out, but Child -- who's now 23 -- stays.Can Landlord raise the rent? [read post]
31 May 2018, 2:23 pm
  Which holds, in a split opinion, that even though the Unfair Competition Law permits a district attorney to bring a lawsuit in the name of the People of the State of California (and obtain relief on behalf of everyone injured), the law doesn't actually do that, and a local DA is instead limited to civil UCL claims in its own jurisdiction.There's something to be said for the majority view. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 5:26 am by Patricia Salkin
Montclair State University v County of Passaic, 2017 WL 3611681 (NJ App. 8/23/2017)  Filed under: Preemption, Uncategorized [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
A Westlaw search of his name reveals that he was counsel of record in nearly 80 reported opinions from 1918 to 1941 (the first of those people People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Not all speech is protected by freedom of expression rights, and not all protest is legitimate in the eyes of the state. [read post]