Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 15,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2019, 12:32 pm
The Court stated that a registration statement may be misleading if “it fails entirely to disclose a material risk that is already known by the company” and concluded that it is a reasonable inference that certain defendants “knew of these impending, and imminent material financial events on July 31, 2015. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
Citing Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
The “Rule of Necessity” permits a tribunal, the members of which could be affected by the decision, to decide a case or controversyPines, et. al. v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 00335, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn deciding an action initiated by Emily Pines and other judges, Supreme Court that held that “the compensation of judges and justices of the Unified Court System of the State of New York was duly increased pursuant to the Laws of… [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
According to Chief Judge Gregory’s self-assigned seventy-page majority opinion, an American who seeks to be reunited with his alien wife suffers a constitutional injury because he felt like an “outsider. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:12 am
Facebook, Klayman v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:08 am
The fact that the parent who is a citizen of the EU is no longer working in that state and has left the state is irrelevant; (c) it is similarly irrelevant that the children and their primary carer are not self-sufficient and are dependent on social assistance; (d) the length of time that the children have been enrolled in their educational courses is also irrelevant. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:21 pm
The recent 10th Circuit Court of Appeals case of US v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:26 am
Albanil v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:02 pm
(quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:57 am
Section 18(2) states that this must be done in writing and must be provided before the client is committed to any liability to the estate agent. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 4:32 am
That’s the issue that the 2nd District tackled last week in State v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:39 am
The Supreme Court Reverses: No Statutory Requirement as to Whistleblowing Employees' Intent or to be Free of Self-interested Motivations. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:05 am
Doe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:06 am
Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 4:31 am
Accepting these allegations as true, plaintiff adequately stated a cause of action for legal malpractice (see New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Any-Time Home Care Inc., 156 AD3d at 1046; New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc., 150 AD3d at 1593; NYAHSA Servs., Inc., Self-Ins. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
Many commentators, including my good friends Randy Barnett and Larry Solum, have praised Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm
Martin Co. v. [read post]
