Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
A cynical voice thundered saying "No, it won't be. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
That doesn’t look like a screw up by the court. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Richard Cleland, Assistant Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Division of Advertising Practices, Federal Trade Commission Managing supervisor on Iovate, Nestle, and Dannon cases. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:47 pm
” The personnel simply haven’t been around. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:16 pm
” The Court’s second round of review of the case, in Stern v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm
(Here's my April 2010 post on Hoang v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
If s/he doesn’t, there’s probably a good reason why not (for example, a lot of psychiatrists don't bring up suicide risk with depressed but non-suicidal patients), and forcing a manufacturer to provide information a doctor doesn’t want to provide is rarely a good idea. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
: Google Books and the Limits of Class- Action Settlements Commentator: Diane Zimmerman, NYU Law School Because of the scintillating quality of the papers presented, I couldn’t let the opportunity pass up to mention them on this site. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm
Such was the case in the run-up to the financial crisis from which we are still recovering. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:01 am
United States, the Supreme Court held that the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) applied to lawyers but held off on addressing the First Amendment issue for now. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 11:49 am
Fish plainly hasn't. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am
[FN3: Alcoholic beverages may be consumed, but at the personal expense of the consumer.] [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:03 am
General Motors Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
Regulating marketing-based speech by lawyers is one matter – personally, I don’t like it but advertising isn’t accorded the same level of protection as political or expressive speech. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:14 pm
Previous post: "Email Ad Network Isn't Liable for Unsolicited Email--Ferron v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:22 pm
But I don’t. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:35 am
After hearing oral arguments last November, the court’s decision for Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:00 am
(Vernor v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:17 am
These kinds of settlements provide concrete evidence of the value to policyholders of Side A insurance protection even outside of the insolvency context, and underscore the importance of added Side A protection in a well-designed D&O insurance program. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
