Search for: "Tenant 1" Results 3901 - 3920 of 6,861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
Basically, it is someone who is a tenant of a flat under a long lease.Before an RTM company can make a claim to acquire the right to manage, it must give a notice inviting participation to anyone who is a qualifying tenant who is not a member of the RTM company: s.78(1). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
Basically, it is someone who is a tenant of a flat under a long lease.Before an RTM company can make a claim to acquire the right to manage, it must give a notice inviting participation to anyone who is a qualifying tenant who is not a member of the RTM company: s.78(1). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:45 am by Allison Tussey
On Feb. 1, 2010, Hanloh recorded two fraudulent quitclaim deeds on Birch Tree and Sea Bright Drive homes. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Two keys to licensing model: (1) clarity on what user gets, (2) respect for user. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
The court noted that It would be absurd if the law required (1) strict adherence to the letter of the contract and (2) disregard of counsel's direction not to contact the tenant directly. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:18 am by WSLL
§ 29-1-601(b) may be invoked against appellee as claimant on a legally groundless and impermiss[i]ble recorded claim of lien. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm by Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.
As I mentioned in Part 1, the soon to be new law contains new provisions as well as some corrective provisions (which will correct unintended consequences from last year’s new law Act 143). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:16 am by Tessa Shepperson
Here is a question to the blog clinic from Rebecca (not her real name) who is a tenant I am a tenant and I want to query whether a clause in my agreement is unfair. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
Therefore LJ Lewison rules that the s21 notice was valid as the expiry date of 1 January 2012 on the notice was more than two months from the date of service and under s21(1)(b) this is all that was required.Different Dates At this point the notice was valid and the appeal was lost for the tenant. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
Therefore LJ Lewison rules that the s21 notice was valid as the expiry date of 1 January 2012 on the notice was more than two months from the date of service and under s21(1)(b) this is all that was required.Different Dates At this point the notice was valid and the appeal was lost for the tenant. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
(The post also assumes that an objector compensatory assessment, of the sort described in the previous post, isn’t available; if it is available as a less restrictive means of protecting health, then it would also be available as a less restrictive means in protecting employee private rights, since it would provide employees with the same benefits as they would get under the unmodified employer mandate.) 1. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:37 am by Siobhan Hayes
As a result, mitigation schemes involving the grant of leases to tenants willing to store items in premises for short periods (but no less than six weeks) have become common. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:37 am by Jayna Vara
As a result, mitigation schemes involving the grant of leases to tenants willing to store items in premises for short periods (but no less than six weeks) have become common. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:24 am by David Markus
The ABA and Thomson-Reuters are even getting into it, offering whopping sales on landlord-tenant treatises and the like. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:10 pm
If two people own a piece of real estate, for example, they can either be joint tenants or tenants in common. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:39 am
Under that section of the Act, a transfer can be declared fraudulent for either of two different reasons: (1) If the transfer was made with the actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud any creditor; or, (2) if the transfer was made without the transferor (Fred Hobbs) receiving a reasonably equivalent exchange and where the transferor, because of the transfer, was left unable to pay his debts (to summarize broadly the very technical language of that section of the Act). [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 6:48 am by SJM
Article 8 and public law defences were raised and the County Court recorder dismissed the Council’s claim in a written judgement on 10/1/13. [read post]