Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 3901 - 3920 of 8,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
The opening paragraph spells out the case: This “groundbreaking” case, as Petitioner describes it, has been going on, unjustifiably and unconstitutionally, for nearly three years now – all because Petitioner has refused to admit or accept that its state law claims against MPHJ are preempted by federal law, barred by the First Amendment “right to petition” clause, and that Congress has decided that federal preemption questions involving the… [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 4:50 am by Immigration Prof
On March 1, Petitioner United States filed its merits brief in the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
” He got the hint and filed an amicus brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:45 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm by Jon Sands
United States, 133 S. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 3:28 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
United States, 146 U.S. 140 (1892), because the court improperly limited its inquiry to whether the external contact amounted to a 'communication' and did not investigate the prejudicial effect of the police tail. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am by Amy Howe
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:10 am by Gene Quinn
Therefore, at this point, it is unclear whether the lawsuit filed by Finjan in the United States Federal District Court for the Northern District of California will proceed. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:23 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:55 pm by Alyson Carney
The teams represented the Petitioner United States and the Respondent Police Officer Billy Roy Campbell. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:22 am by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
In order to determine whether a peremptory challenge is fair and legitimate, Maryland courts apply a three-step process established by the United States Supreme Court in the Batson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
The Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (2006) or “RULLCA” continues to gain momentum as it spreads across the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
The Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (2006) or “RULLCA” continues to gain momentum as it spreads across the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
The Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (2006) or “RULLCA” continues to gain momentum as it spreads across the United States. [read post]