Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 9,182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2011, 2:47 am
Altman's vulnerable medical state and age meant that her chances for reemployment into a comparable position were very low, and justified an extended period of notice. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
We realize what we're facing.I recall a suppression hearing I had before a federal district court judge who went on to become the Attorney General of the United States of America. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:50 pm
Jonathan Markell and U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 6:54 pm
In cases in which a party asserts they are protected from liability via governmental immunity, the courts will weigh several factors to determine whether the assertion is true, as illustrated in Rivera v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
Oh, by the way, I suppose it also is relevant that the United States Trustee did not object to either Baker Botts’s original fee or the fee it requested for the cost of defending its application, and that the bankruptcy judge rejected all of ASARCO’s challenges to the underlying fee award. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
By Eric Goldman Cammarata v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
Martinez v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
In the case, United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:49 am
Crocs, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:24 pm
It is this dreadful feature of our political system, NOT required by the Constitution, that explains why it now counts as "success" if the United States doesn't go over a "cliff" or continues to pay its debts, as against genuinely confronting the serious problems that face us as a polity. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm
Anyone reading his essay must realize, first and foremost, that members of these groups are absolutely serious in believing that they are devoted to the one true Constitution that has, in their view, been systematically violated by those actually running the contemporary United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 1:38 pm
That's true. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 9:28 am
Susan V. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Article III provides that federal courts may hear “cases” and “controversies,” including “all cases, in law and equity, arising under . . . the laws of the United States . . . . [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:07 pm
But that’s not true. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:09 pm
” See Crepage v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:12 am
It’s true, of course, that Larry Tribe defended the bona fides of the so-called 27thAmendment, actually sent out to the states as the original “second amendment” in 1789 and declared ratified a mere 203 years later in 1992. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:50 am
S. 461, 487, 488 (2004); United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:43 pm
There, the Supreme Court upheld a California moratorium on new nuclear power plants within the state until the United States developed a means of disposing of spent nuclear fuel. [read post]