Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit" Results 3901 - 3920 of 6,435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:57 am by Ashley J. Remillard
In both cases, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that, because the ESA citizen suit provision independently authorizes a private right of action, the APA does not govern plaintiffs’ claims. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Ninth Circuit Court allowed them into the case, finding that they had “standing” to defend the measure in the absence of the state. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 1:58 am by Florian Mueller
Google will even have the right to appeal the upcoming rulings, so the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court may also have the pleasure to deal with them.The problem I see here -- and which I believe Google's decision-makers should also recognize -- is that a lot of businesspeople involved with licensing (I've done a variety of license deals over the years) may view Google's… [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:31 pm
Jan 2, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”) precluded plaintiffs’ class claims for violations of California Business & Professions Code § 17200, but did not preclude plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am by Greg Mersol
And, most recently, the United States District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia  determined that President Obama’s recess appointments in January 2012 were illegal. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:21 pm by Florian Mueller
She also concluded that "the authorized sales to Apple occurred in the United States", which is another requirement. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:45 pm by Florian Mueller
Next time he may see Apple and Google (Motorola Mobility) in his primary capacity.The latest procedural dispute between Apple and Google (Motorola) is over which U.S. appeals court -- the Federal Circuit or the Seventh Circuit -- should hear the parties' cross-appeal of a FRAND contract ruling handed down in November 2012 by the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:51 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  Ignoring the strong analogy between the two statutory provisions, the District Court and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that rules promulgated by the Port Authority were not of the same type as laws generally governing motor carriers in Los Angeles, but were special rules limited to the Port Authority alone. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 8:30 am by azatty
Canby Jr. of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a founding faculty member of the College of Law. [read post]