Search for: "United States v. Brown" Results 3901 - 3920 of 4,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2009, 3:05 pm
At the end, Jone’s father was able to get the help of a Congressman to secure his daughter’s return to the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Arguing that this practice leads to judges hesitant to make unpopular decisions, the former justice advocated for a universally merit-based system of judicial appointments, pointing out that landmark decisions like Brown v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 4:37 am
 CARY PRESS,;No 06-CV-6686 (JFB) (ARL);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
They are, rather, asserting claims that sound in traditional state tort law. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: UK government revives downloader cut-off proposal; ISPs object (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) CAFC grants Microsoft expedited patent appeal in Word case; Microsoft submits opening brief in appeal: i4i Ltd v Microsoft Corp (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Washington State… [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:33 pm by Richard Strong
In so determining, the district court looked to other evidence that was the basis of other child pornography charges to determine the defendant's sexual proclivities.The question presented is whether or not extrensic evidence of other photographs helps determine if one of the United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:53 am by Keith Donoghue
District courts must speak clearly before striking with a big stick, the Court reiterates in United States v. [read post]