Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 3901 - 3920 of 9,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Navy SEAL, has withdrawn its permission for the United States to run Special Operations ground operations to target terrorists in the country. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am by Tiffany Blofield
  The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that he was arrested, incarcerated, and criminally prosecuted for engaging in constitutionally protected free speech and was detained and arrested without probable cause in violation of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm by Orin Kerr
The best case in support of a due process right for a provider to challenge an assistance order is In re Application of the United States of America, 610 F.2d 1148 (3d Cir. 1979). [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 6:45 am by John H Curley
The arbitrator's award must be affirmed, and summary judgment is therefore granted to Merck.The Court's decision in  United Steelworkers, Local 10-00086 v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Under the DACA program, they are permitted to remain in the United States for some period of time as long as they meet certain conditions. [read post]
By Kiran Jassal The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments for Lee v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:14 am by Randazza
In the United States, plaintiffs try to avoid states with Anti-SLAPP laws, for example. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:06 am by Gerald Maatman, Jr.
In the third post of our series on workplace class action issues, this blog posting focuses on the statistical study of class certification rulings throughout the Unites States in 2016. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 3:25 am by Xandra Kramer
Mr Justice Fraser stated that separate legal personality of the constituent entities of corporate group represents a fundamental principle of English law (at [92]) and claimants failed to provide evidence of high degree of control and direction by RDS sufficient to meet the three-fold test on the existence of duty of care set by Caparo Industries plc v Dickman and clarified by Chandler v Cape. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm by Howard Friedman
Davenport, 637 F.3d 1095 (2010) he wrote a dissent from the denial of an en banc rehearing in a case which held that memorial crosses donated by the Utah Highway Patrol Association and placed on public property to commemorate fallen troopers violate the Establishment Clause.⇾ In United States v. [read post]