Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 3901 - 3920 of 10,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm by Bill Otis
 He was both an Assistant US Attorney and then United States Attorney, followed by 17 years of service as a US District Judge for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:34 am by Joy Waltemath
The Justices have not yet determined whether they will take up the petition for certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Peter Margulies
A denial of a visa is a final decision that for the foreseeable future will preclude a noncitizen’s admission to the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog had a post on regulatory developments affecting social media use  in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
  The United States Supreme Court granted cert this week in Carpenter v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
But perhaps the Chief Justice’s highest-profile case was United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:33 am by Josh H. Escovedo
The Lanham Act is protective of all trademarks that a proponent can establish having used in the United States, whether registered or not. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:33 am by Josh H. Escovedo
The Lanham Act is protective of all trademarks that a proponent can establish having used in the United States, whether registered or not. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Matthew David Brozik
Instead, they sued in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, petitioning the court for cancellation of the GOOGLE marks under the Lanham Act. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That led to fireworks on the floor of the United States Senate in 2005. [read post]
Committee analyses note that this bill was modeled after the recent measure passed in the United Kingdom that requires employers with 250 or more employees to publish their gender pay figures by April 2018. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
At Education Week, Mark Walsh reports that “the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
United States, a case that could have major Fourth Amendment implications. [read post]