Search for: "United States v. Small" Results 3901 - 3920 of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2014, 9:11 am by Greg Mersol
  While, perhaps, the decision is not quite as defense friendly as the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am by Carolyn E. Wright
In the United States, copyright vests in a work when it is created (17 U.S.C. 302 (a))  and “fixed in any tangible medium” (17 U.S.C. 102 (a)). [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 7:36 am by John Hopkins
I believe in the Constitution of the United States and the Seventh Amendment. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
They argued that their clients shouldn’t have to pay taxes (United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:02 pm by Nancy Morawetz
Gonzales (8-1 decision rejecting broad application of the drug-aggravated-felony category to any state drug felony); Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Spicy IP)   Ireland New guidelines for dealing with extensions in time (Class 46)   Malta International: Malta announces tax exemption for patent royalties (IP finance)   Poland Time of bad faith in trade mark application (Class 46)   South Africa World Cup 2010: Fake shirts pour in (Afro-IP)   Spain Court elaborates on ‘trade mark families’ (Class 46)   United Kingdom Unilever threatens legal action against BNP to prevent Marmite appearing in… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  In the latter category, we have Gallop v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
This is a remedy applied in the United States to ensure that the courts are not used to authorize discovery for cases that will not be heard. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Had that been the case, the New York State and United States legislatures would have added language providing for such exceptions. [read post]