Search for: "X, Y "
Results 3901 - 3920
of 4,308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 3:48 pm
High Court (Administrative Court) Mohamed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin) (21 August 2008) Prospect v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWHC 2056 (Admin) (27 August 2008) Mohamed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2100 (Admin) (29 August 2008) High Court (Family Division) The Local Authority v RK & Ors… [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 8:33 pm
See Findings, ¶ ¶ 33, 34, and X, Y, FF, GG. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:29 pm
I’ve written before about the various generations of workers in law firms (see Generation X, Y, & ME in Your Law Firm and Attorney 2.0 - Generation Y in Your Law Firm). [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 12:19 pm
Factual background and Ombudsman's recommendation Mrs X, Mrs Y and Mrs Z went to the solicitors T, for advice about applying for guardianship of Mr X [Mrs X's son] and to transfer the titles to Mrs X's house into the names of Mrs Y and Mrs Z. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 6:43 pm
All together now, y’all: “Whoo-whoo! [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 1:57 am
The SEC found that E&Y and certain of its partners had engaged in improper professional conduct, had violated Rule 2-02(b) of Regulation S-X, or had caused each of these three audit clients to violate Sections 13(a) and 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 14a-3. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:42 pm
Four of them have decided X. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:11 pm
Just click x and do y. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 6:28 pm
can do a lot of good legal work without putting the rest of us out of work; Dan Hull's recommendation that first and second year associates be paid in experience rather than dollars (make law school one year and you're on Dan); Lawrence Taylor's frightening image of cops with needles; our sister blog's coverage of the recent FBI Blogger arrest and tips on negotiating with the FBI when they're on your doorstep; Susan… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 9:50 pm
Here are the summaries of sessions that I have tracked down: Keynote: The War for Talent by Rob Robinson of Complex Discovery Collaboration Tools: Collaboration Tools and Technologies for Lawyers by LawyerKM Legal Aspects of Collaboration Tools by LawyerKM Legal Aspects of Collaboration Tools by David Hobbie of Caselines Legal Aspects of Collaboration Tools by me Email Management Interwoven Email Management by David Hobbie of Caselines Enterprise Content… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:11 pm
Here’s my coverage of a related ILTA program called Baby Boomers and Generation X and Generation Y - Addressing Generation Gaps in Culture and Technology in the [...] [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:47 pm
That figure rises to 41 percent among Gen X and 49 percent among Gen Y. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 8:27 am
High Court (Family Division) X and Y, Re Bundles [2008] EWHC 2058 (Fam) (22 August 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) HM Attorney General v Ford & Anor [2008] EWHC 2066 (Admin) (21 July 2008) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 4:28 pm
But $X + $Y settled the case ten minutes later. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:02 pm
If more than 50% of the contractors in a locality are paying "x" dollars per hour for a particular trade, then that should be the true prevailing rate for that classification instead of the "y" dollars per hour imposed by the union (which is typically a higher rate). [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 4:08 am
This was sent via email from someone calling themselves "The Wife of Michael Kennedy," which has not been verified, nor will it be. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 2:53 pm
" Because both Academic X and Law School Y have aligned personal and institutional agendas, their cooperation and commitment grows the institutional pie; both are made better off. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:03 am
All techniques took as input the x-y coordinates of crimes (all committed by the same crook) on a map and made predictions of the criminal's home location. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 3:07 pm
Company Y will want to acquire us. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 9:43 am
Here's the abstract:Under traditional "two-party" norms of international law, an aggression by state X against state Y only gives state Y the right to retaliate. [read post]
