Search for: "AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION " Results 3921 - 3940 of 8,761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 12:52 pm by Christina D. Frangiosa
While a large portion of the Bill relates to government action that can be taken by the Attorney General, the private right of action included in this Bill provides separate benefits to rightsholders, allowing them to enforce their rights, independent of any action that the government may take against the wrongdoer. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:52 pm by Christina D. Frangiosa
While a large portion of the Bill relates to government action that can be taken by the Attorney General, the private right of action included in this Bill provides separate benefits to rightsholders, allowing them to enforce their rights, independent of any action that the government may take against the wrongdoer. [read post]
17 May 2021, 9:33 am by Antoinette Vermilye
We are not asking for monetary awards but rather are asking for immediate and concerted action to apply the precautionary principle. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:33 am by Steve Bainbridge
If there is anything left of neutral principles, one ought to object to decisions, such as Gustafson, which narrow the scope of an express cause of action in ways that are counter to congressional intent. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:33 am by Cameron Kerry, John B Morris, Jr.
This class action case was brought under the first federal privacy statute—the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) of 1970—by a plaintiff who sought damages because a “people search engine” used to assess individual credit allegedly contained inaccuracies. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
There are those who see in war, in virtually every aspect, as a contextually based obligation where it serves higher values and prevents the perpetuation of values and actions deemed morally repugnant. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:50 am by Scott Moore
This means that in principle the U.S. could get some value out of deploying and refining U.S. carbon capture technology in China through a joint venture. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:09 am by Vikram Raghavan
Rather, I believe India would be well-placed in asserting jurisdiction on the passive personality principle. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
It also protects the core American Constitutional principles of federalism and the separation of powers. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 9:41 am
GPO 2009 $8.00 Stored Value Cards and Other New Payment Devices Rosenberg, Arnold S Lexis Nexis 2009 $3.00 Tax Action Coordinator Zelman, Steven A. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Dattu of the Supreme Court of India, in Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 6:11 pm
  I started with Andy Olree's faith-based book on The Choice Principle. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
The Supreme Court had affirmed his conviction for refusing to tell the House Un-American Activities Committee whether he was or ever had been a communist. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:23 am
In my contribution to the symposium honoring the work of Monroe Freedman, I argued that there is a cab-rank principle in American law, even if there isn't a bottom-line, enforceable duty to accept representation of any client. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:27 am by SHG
It’s not a principled view of rights, but then, dead people have no rights. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Litman noted, however, that federal cannabis regulations may violate constitutional principles of federalism. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” After all, if Obama lacks democratic legitimacy in making judicial appointments, then why are any of his actions legitimate? [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
And, likewise, it can refer conduct to other authorities for action. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:47 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Sage, the Court began with a familiar principle victorious litigants love to hate: “Under the American Rule, a prevailing party” in a breach of contract dispute “may not recover attorneys’ fees from the losing party” unless the agreement contains “express language or indicia of the parties’ ‘unmistakably clear’ intent to indemnify each other for attorneys’ fees in an action between them on the contract”… [read post]