Search for: "BELL v. BELL"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 5,135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2010, 7:41 am
" In the case of United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:51 pm
Agency v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
Sunset, Eastham, MA, October 12, 2009 Section 2(d) - likelihood of confusion: Finding "BELL HILL" for Wine and "BELL'S" for Beer Too Dissimilar, TTAB Dismisses 2(d) Opposition Fame of Snoop Dogg Overwhelms "SNOOPTUNES" Applicant in 2(d) Opposition Appying Wella, TTAB Reverses 12 out of 16 Section 2(d) Refusals WYHA? [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
CARE FIRM $20K AWARD, Bell Care Nurses Registry v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 10:29 am
Note: Commenter Åsk Dabitch reminded me I omitted the Kelly v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am
” Q is for the Queen v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
State v Urgrovics2. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 4:51 pm
(quoting Bell v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:42 pm
See Bell v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
Provided that defendant attorneys were not discharged for cause, in which case they would not be entitled to any fee (see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326 [1936]), their recovery would be limited to the fair and reasonable value of their services, computed on the basis of quantum meruit (see Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655, 658 [1993]; Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454, 457-458 [1989]; Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz,… [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:17 am
As I noted in an earlier post, jurisdiction is a court’s power to act in a given case. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:20 am
Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:17 am
The old adage that "the bell rung cannot be unrung" comes to mind. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:04 pm
In reaching this conclusion, the trial court relied on what it characterized as the "procedures" mandated by the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
Bell Co., 114 F. 362, 362 (C.C.D. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:23 pm
Congress is considering legislation to undo the Supreme Court's holdings in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:47 pm
Congress is considering legislation to undo the Supreme Court's holdings in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
