Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 3921 - 3940 of 8,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2015, 1:21 pm
FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty Images The case is a Connecticut trial court case, Archer v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Jeff Welty
Or does the existence of inexpensive drones present a novel Fourth Amendment concern that will require a novel doctrine to address it, as the Supreme Court arguably charted new courses regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 10:53 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Nankivell Battle Over LinkedIn Account Between Employer and Employee Largely Gutted–Eagle v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:23 am by Root User
This is Shari’s last week at EFF, as she is moving with her family out of state. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
The decision is Roger Maier and Assos of Switzerland SA v ASOS plc and ASOS.com Limited at [2015] EWCA Civ 220. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm by Corey Brettschneider
Corey Brettschneider & Nelson TebbeLast week, the Court heard arguments in Walker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
As explained in our article, the battle for the heights in Berkeley is far from over. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
 The High Court’s decision in Serdar Mohammed v Secretary of State for Defence (2015) further stretched the ECHR’s reach to Afghanistan. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm by Gillian E. Metzger
The legitimacy of presidential constitutionalism is frequently debated, most recently in the context of President Obama’s refusal to defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The ruling comes after a ten-year legal battle by The Guardian and journalist Rob Evans to get the letters released under the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 1:36 am by INFORRM
There seems to be little chance of IPSO finding such a breach, following its rulings in Littler v Sunday Express, and Elton-Campbell v Daily Mail. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Look for more battles over these and other contested policies in the months ahead. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 2:26 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
This week the Ontario Court of Appeal released a much awaited decision in the case of Westerhof v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Jeyaretnam was embroiled in a series of damaging legal battles with Lee, which eventually forced him to declare bankruptcy. [read post]