Search for: "Best v. Best"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 41,818
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:26 am
As Melbourne v Melbourne has yet to be cited by other cases on the daycare issue, it is too soon to know if the same factors will become the default test for determining the best interest of the child in daycare disputes moving forward. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:51 am
Whatever my academic or personal views might be about the propriety of sealing or pseudonymity in any particular case, as a lawyer I'd be glad to provide the court with the best arguments for whatever position needs to be covered, and I'm sure my students would as well. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:18 am
This conclusion is buttressed by the tenor of the Supreme Court’s unanimous 2021 opinion in AMG Capital v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Given these inevitable failures, I think that constitutional thinkers ought to figure out how to make the best of the Constitution we have and faults we know, rather than design a new constitution whose unknown faults are likely to become apparent very quickly. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
State lawmakers are generally better positioned than federal lawmakers to ascertain such in-state preferences and implement the best policies based on them. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
What impact does physical or emotional abuse have on the best-interest analysis in Tennessee child-custody disputes? [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 12:42 am
The ITC SEP case still looks very interesting, the Colombian injunction continues to be enforced, and next week the Munich I Regional Court will hold a first hearing in an Ericsson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm
A quick look into the fine print suggests that Shell’s net-zero emissions target qualifies at best as an aspiration that may not even be consistent with Shell’s current plans, strategies, budgets, and pricing assumptions. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:12 pm
This was, of course, the Act at issue in Monsanto v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:28 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
If so, it’s not obvious that changing the Constitution is the best way of preventing a repetition. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
The authors’ job is to make sense of the judicial reasoning and to unpick, for example, the madness of the majority theocratic US Supreme Court’s politicised and reactionary abominations, as in Roe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 7:31 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:00 am
Clanton v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Even the best constitutional design may not be able to prevent tyranny if powerful malefactors desire it. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 5:52 am
Due to the 2001 court decision Bowling v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 11:36 am
R (S) v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 11:35 am
” People v. [read post]
