Search for: "C. M. v. State"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 6,604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 7:12 am
Federal form 1040-V, Payment Voucher (downloads as a pdf). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al. 2013 FC 6Constitutional Law - Federal jurisdiction (s. 91) – Indians and land reserved for Indians – Indian defined The plaintiffs sought declarations that Métis and Non-status Indians were “Indians” within the meaning of the expression “Indians and lands reserved for Indians” in s. 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867; (b) that the Queen (in right of Canada) owed a fiduciary… [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:07 am
§§ 17.47(c) (DTPA); 521.151(a) (ITEPA). [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
The application was rejected pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of the CTM Regulation and the examiner stated that Maharishi had failed to prove that the sign had acquired distinctive character through use in Belgium and France, ex Article 7(3). [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm
As most readers are probably aware, the past few years have seen considerable media and clinical interest in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a progressive, neurodegenerative condition linked to, and thought to result from, concussions, blasts, and other forms of brain injury (including, importantly, repeated but milder sub-concussion-level injuries) that can lead to a variety of mood and cognitive disorders, including depression, suicidality, memory loss, dementia,… [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:54 am
Maybe… The age of drugs / Dalrymple (Illus. in: Puck, v. 48, no. 1231 (1900 October 10), centerfold). [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm
As the court stated in Ransom v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The Court explicitly recognises the applicability of Article 10 in this case : “La Cour rappelle que l’article 10 de la Convention a vocation à s’appliquer à la communication au moyen de l’Internet (..), quel que soit le type de message qu’il s’agit de véhiculer (..), et même lorsque l’objectif poursuivi est de nature lucrative (..). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
by: Adam C. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
by: Adam C. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
From 1973 to 1975 she was law clerk to Judge Frank M. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am
Mr & Mrs M were approaching retirement and were found to be not wealthy. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am
Mr & Mrs M were approaching retirement and were found to be not wealthy. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
(He got a C on the paper proposing the campaign, by the way.) [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:54 am
Mystic Blue Cruises, Inc., 11 C 1986 (Aug 9, 2012 N.D. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:04 am
LAKE v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:09 am
Here is the opinion in : AG Canada v Leonard & Gionet The court’s summary: L and M were Aboriginal Canadians whose extradition was sought by the United States of America to stand trial on drug charges. [read post]
