Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2013, 11:52 am
Plaintiffs Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341, 350 (2001)), but also was “purposefully excluded” by the California state legislature when it initially enacted the MEA. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:01 pm
” We made the same argument in our amicus brief: “Just as the Riley Court stated that ‘data on the phone can endanger no one,’ physical items cannot be hidden in digital data. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:07 am
It concluded that, in light of the Washington State’s Supreme Court opinion in Scott v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:04 pm
This is a go to website for the California Superior, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Courts. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:38 pm
Further, the court stated that, 'Defendant did not have a duty to reduce risks that are inherent to bumper car riding.' On appeal? [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:04 pm
Perry, barring an appeal by the proponents of the California ban, the ballot measure known as “Proposition 8. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am
Tribal Business Council of Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html In the Matter of the Dependency of: R.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:52 pm
Edelson is an editor and contributing author to TRADE SECRET LITIGATION AND PROTECTION IN CALIFORNIA (Defend Trade Secrets Act Supplement (State Bar of California 2017). [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
" They further challenged the trial court's interpretation of state law barring deceptive representations of geographic origin. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
Did the State Bar of California have research indicating that its cut score of 144 was more protective of the public than New York’s 133? [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:46 am
” Here, the court addressed only the situation before it: the legislature barred a specific word unless products met a specific definition. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Griswold Prize by the Supreme Court Historical Society (NY City Bar). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
The court's order on two of the special conditions was remanded sot that the trial court can narrowly tailor them. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm
" The court of appeal also noted that, even when the California Supreme Court in Sav-On encouraged courts to be innovative with class trial procedures, it stated that the innovative procedures still must "protect[] the rights of all the parties. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
State. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am
And Petitioners have a pending motion to intervene in another case challenging the Rule in the Northern District of California, which means that when all is said and done they will have been subjected to all three approaches that the courts of appeals take to adequacy of representation. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 2:46 am
Yesterday Apple filed a summary judgment motion with the United States District Court for the Southern District of California (where Qualcomm is based) that is a major threat to Google's (Motorola Mobility's) ability to seek U.S. patent injunctions or import bans against Apple over cellular standard-essential patents (SEPs) regardless of what will or will not happen on the FRAND contract front between these companies. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
Stevens, according to State bar records, bilked her injured clients out of millions of dollars of settlement money and is considered a danger to the public. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:07 am
If a suit against state officers is precluded in the national courts by the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution, and may be forbidden by a State to its courts, as it is contended in the case at bar that it may be, without power of review by this court, it must be evident that an easy way is open to prevent the enforcement of many provisions of the Constitution … . [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
Concepcion (2011) 563 U.S. 321, the Supreme Court considered California's Discover Bank rule, which invalidated agreements to waive class claims in certain consumer cases. [read post]
