Search for: "Court v. State"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 207,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2008, 3:40 pm
Spivey v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 12:15 am
On Friday, a two-judge panel of the High Court of Justice decided R (Saadoon & Mufdhi) v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
The Court in Michigan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 11:32 am
Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
As the case was pending discretionary review from the New Mexico Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court issued its Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Supreme Court granted certiorari in a CAFA case, Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 11:18 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 12:07 pm
[Toeller v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 12:24 pm
State of Washington v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
(State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 8:16 am
The Washington Court in McCurry v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:05 pm
Greenwood v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:39 pm
In United States v.Conrad Clinton Blair, No. 12-4427, the Court rejects an expansive reading of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Descamps v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
And, by our recent standards, it's unimportant news -- we've been wallowing in Supreme Court cases, and now it's back to the trial courts.But we really liked what a federal trial court did in Ebel v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:04 am
Of course, under United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:18 pm
In State v Price, Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:11 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 44 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (Sandiford) v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] UKSC 44 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:26 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Landry (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 785, 791 [California Supreme Court interpretation of federal law binding when there is “no contrary United States Supreme Court decision” on the issue]; see also Perry v. [read post]
