Search for: "Does 1-100 " Results 3921 - 3940 of 12,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm by Lawrence Higgins
(Patently-O readers can save 100 pounds by using discount code PO 100) [Link] Houston Intellectual Property Law Association (HIPLA) will be holding its Annual IP Institute in Galveston, Texas October 6-8. [read post]
27 May 2008, 5:00 am
(3) The proposed new rule has many protections built in (which it does) to protect clients' rights [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:12 pm by Patrick A. Malone
It advises moderate changes to treatment in about 1 in 4 cases, and major changes in 16 in 100. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:03 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Arbitrarily deciding to declare $1 billion of gain would be equivalent to paying $1 billion for a government bond that paid a market interest rate. [read post]
9 Nov 2024, 12:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
Does 1-6: The ACLU asserts that Defendants are actively engaged in activities to threaten, intimidate, harass, and deter voters from participating in the 2024 election. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:13 am
The Amendment does not allow any reduction in US trust funds for the benefit of all US cedents as established by accredited reinsurers. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by David Crockett
Grantee #1 does not have to prove that the grantee #2 somehow had actual knowledge of the sale or transfer to grantee #1. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm by Emily Robertson
Are we taxing $100 per parking spot, or $150 per parking spot? [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:59 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
heavy – exerting 50 to 100 pounds of force occasionally or 25 to 50 pounds of force frequently 5.     [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Suppose that a taxpayer in the top tax bracket receives $100 of investment income. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Yet, Spokeo also confirmed that in some cases, a violation of a statutory right does amount to a concrete harm, even where that harm is intangible. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In fact, it does not explicitly limit the arbitrator's authority in any way other than stating that the arbitrator does not have the power to "amend, modify or delete any provision of the CBA," which does not set any limitations on the arbitrator's power to order the remedy that he or she sees fit (see Matter of Shenendehowa Cent. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:22 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm's new claim is a combination of claim 1, claim 3 (dependent on claim 1), claim 5 (dependent on claim 3), claim 7 (dependent on claim 1, which means it actually wasn't meant to be combined with claims 3 and 5 that are on a different branch of the tree), and a new claim limitation referred to as "7.3" (unfortunately neither the court nor counsel explained what exactly it was about), which may not even have adequate support in the… [read post]