Search for: "Held v. State" Results 3921 - 3940 of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2009, 9:12 pm
Mich Ave Assoc dba The Congress Plaza Hotel v Shannon, ___F.3d____(7th Cir. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 7:46 am by MBettman
Merit Decision On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in Doss v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:15 am by John Steele
  The Court held that the 14th Amendment does not categorically require the state to provide counsel for all indigent parents facing a civil contempt hearing for non-payment of childs support where the other parent is also not represented by counsel. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:11 am
County Executive's order recognizing same sex marriages held lawfulGodfrey v Spano, 2008 NY Slip Op 10584, Decided on December 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Second Department Margaret Godfrey asked the court to declare that Westchester County Executive Order No. 3 of 2006 was illegal, unconstitutional, and void. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:53 am by Robbie Stern
In Muršic v Croatia (2017) 65 EHHR 1, the European Court of Human Rights held that an Article 3 breach will be established if, subject to certain qualifications, a prisoner will be accorded personal space in his or her cell amounting to less than 3m². [read post]