Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 6,206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2012, 3:08 pm
On appeal to New York’s highest Court, the Court of Appeals in Simkin v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:00 am
CSX Transportation,110662 (March 22, 2012), was filed after the wife of a CSX Transportation employee developed mesothelioma; the wife alleged that her mesothelioma was caused by exposure to asbestos on her husband's work clothes. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:26 am
Alternatively, had the wife poorly invested the cash she received from the husband, she would have no claim against the ex-husband for her loss. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am
The Husband agreed to pay the wife $6,250,000 "[a]s and for an equitable distribution of property ... and in satisfaction of the Wife's support and marital property rights. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:56 am
It's all in the minutia of the divorce dollars. in Sevey v Friedlander ; 2011 NY Slip Op 02978 ;Decided on April 14, 2011 ;Appellate Division, Third Department we see that even the purchase of a car by husband is factored into the mix. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:42 pm
This singularly bizarre bit of legal "advice" was not accurate - just like it isn't accurate that the police can't arrest a husband and a wife for the same crime. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:10 pm
As we noted here, the couple’s 2006 divorce agreement allocated a Madoff brokerage account to the husband and fairly apportioned all other marital assets. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:09 am
The Simkin v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
In this case the wife sought a domestic violence injunction against her husband. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:57 am
The husband had been ordered to pay the wife's costs of her claim for ancillary relief. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
P.; BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellees. 1st District.Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Marital/non-marital assets -- Error to designate wife's jewelry as nonmarital -- Error to value certificate of deposit awarded to husband as of date of filing due to CD's passive appreciation -- Trial court erred in failing to equitably distribute contents of marital home, instead acceding without… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:05 pm
The Court is mindful that this is a lengthy marriage and that [Husband's] duty to support [Wife] will not terminate by the mere passage of time. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:55 am
In Chavez v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
The court erred in determining that Leone's waiver of her interest in the retirement plan death benefit was not "explicit, voluntary and made in good faith" ( Silber v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:02 pm
" FC § 3600 provides that "the court may order ... the husband or wife to pay any amount that is necessary for the support of the wife or husband, consistent with the requirements of subdivisions (i) and (m) of Section 4320 and Section 4325.... [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 7:14 am
Susan was initially listed as the sole beneficiary of her husband's policy. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
URL Pharma, Inc. involved an lawsuit by a decedent's estate against an ERISA plan administrator and the decedent's ex-wife, who was beneficiary as beneficiary of her ex-husband's 401(k) plan, seeking a declaration that the decedent's estate was entitled to the funds in the 401(k) account because of a waiver signed by the ex-wife as part of a property settlement upon divorce. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:32 pm
In Simpkins v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:14 pm
In a California family law case, Dawn D. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:08 am
The plaintiffs in both cases challenge the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA, which defines “marriage”, in federal law, to mean “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.” In both cases, Judge Joseph Tauro held that the statute was indeed unconstitutional. [read post]
