Search for: "Husband v. Wife" Results 3921 - 3940 of 6,701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2012, 1:52 am
CASESR v R [2012] EWHC 2390 (Fam) (13 August 2012)Judgment in wife's application for financial remedy orders on dissolution of marriage, in case involving, inter alia, the evaluation of the wife's contributions to the development of the husband's company. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:13 pm
In Towles v Towles, the Supreme Court held that a wife who agreed not to sue her husband in order to reconcile with him would not be held to that agreement, as it was against public policy. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:26 am by Tobias Thienel
  Her husband attempted to continue the legal proceedings begun by his wife (and himself). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:21 am
Horn gets retained to represent a husband and wife in a lot line dispute with their neighbors. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:26 am by Tobias Thienel
 Her husband attempted to continue the legal proceedings begun by his wife (and himself). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am by Rosalind English
Debbie Purdy’s husband fell within that class, and so would Martin’s wife if she were willing to help. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:03 pm
Johnson, [1978] 2 All E.R. 935 at 938, [1977] EWCA Civ 4: In the well-known case of Balfour v Balfour, [[1919] 2 K.B. 571 at 579], Atkin LJ said that family arrangements made between husband and wife "are not contracts because the parties did not intend that they should be attended by legal consequences". [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:02 am by Bryan Fears
There is a split of authority on the issue of whether only one debtor can avoid a lien on real property when the property is jointly owned by a husband and wife. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:45 am
A husband and wife were on their motorcycle, and got into a collision. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:45 am
A husband and wife were on their motorcycle, and got into a collision. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Charles Johnson
Conspiracy is one of the most often used crimes in the arsenal of the United State’s Attorneys Office. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:17 am by Legal Beagle
”Lord Mathews commented on the size of Mr Hastings £150K claim for damages, saying : “I do not consider, on the evidence before me, that the damages should be as great as they were in for example Munro v Brown, and I assess solatium at £15,000. [read post]