Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 3921 - 3940 of 18,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 2:32 pm by Orin Kerr
” If two people live in a home and one person invites you in while the other tells you to go away, Justice Souter reasoned, you’re not going to feel comfortable entering. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:57 am by SHG
While they’re vague about how much of a payment a justice can pocket, there must of necessity be some latitude since one never knows what his mother’s house will cost or how large the money for winning a billionaire’s “prize” will be. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
Steven Mazie of Big Think discusses how Justice Kennedy might vote in Fisher v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:26 am
Justices: EPA Can Control Car Emissions [AP via Washington Post] EPA must consider global warming again [SCOTUSblog] Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm by Orin Kerr
Justices Breyer and Ginsburg are pretty obvious votes for the mandate, as they dissented in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan, Margaret Taylor
Consovoy answers that the presidency is a special office, just like the justices of the Supreme Court: As Chief Justice Burger's concurring opinion in Nixon v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Author: Bill Pizzi, emeritus University of Colorado Law SchoolAbortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:04 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses a recent article by Erin Morrow Hawley in which Hawley suggests that, in its June decision in Burwell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
So we like to think that by this time we're familiar with all the arguments, pro and con. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm by Stephen Jenei
The entire opinion is as follows: “In light of our decision in In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am by Victoria Kwan
Also on May 1, Ginsburg presided over a re-enactment of Goesaert v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
  Indeed, in his opinion for the Court in Gomez-Perez case, Justice Alito rejected the argument that a prior case - Jackson v. [read post]