Search for: "John Branch" Results 3921 - 3940 of 5,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm by John Elwood
(John Elwood) So as all of you doubtless already know (and probably discussed over lunch), today the D.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:06 pm by Danielle Citron
In response to a question at last weekend’s Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, Chief Justice John Roberts expressed his agreement with the views of D.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:29 pm
The result of their petition, presented to the Continental Congress by a Marine Captain named John Grannis, was that the Continental Congress voted in March of 1777 to suspend Hopkins from his post. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:01 am by Glenn Reynolds
THEY TOLD ME IF I VOTED FOR JOHN MCCAIN, EMINENT LAW PROFESSORS WOULD BE PROCLAIMING A “LAWLESS PRESIDENCY. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:27 pm
John Collins in this article cited earlier (at pp. 159-60) and restated in his recent book on Adam and Eve (pp. 120-21):1. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Bartlett (1984), courts are limited to the statutory text, legislative history, and views of the Executive Branch or can instead also consider other external indicia; and (2) whether the lower court properly ruled that a Native American tribe's reservation had been "disestablished. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:57 am by Patti Spencer
But aside from some lifetime gifts to the Cotsworths, equal distribution to the two branches remained. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:00 pm
"You can't wine and dine juries," as one lawyer puts it, citing the corrosive influence of money on other branches of government -- and even, increasingly, the judicial system, illustrated in the doc by the well-financed political campaigns waged against judges. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:00 pm
"You can't wine and dine juries," as one lawyer puts it, citing the corrosive influence of money on other branches of government -- and even, increasingly, the judicial system, illustrated in the doc by the well-financed political campaigns waged against judges. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:07 am by David Miller
”  Director of OSTP John Holdren issued further guidance on scientific integrity in a December 17, 2010 memorandum. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:11 pm by David Ferriero
  John is the author of Guastavino Vaulting:  The Art of Structural Tile (Princeton… [ Read all ] [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:57 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
”  The provision may well contravene constitutional principles of Separation of Powers, insofar as it permits final judicial determinations of a patent’s validity to be overruled by an executive branch agency. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:25 am by Rick
Amazon.com Widgets CommentsJune 22, 2011, John Kindley writes: Criticizing the justices of the supreme court of the state in which you're licensed as an attorney and suggesting their actions are lawless and might warrant a revolution?! [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:22 am by Joe Consumer
The memorable case that provides the title -- a woman who sued McDonald's after being scalded by its coffee -- is only one of several that served as fodder for both libertarians like John Stossel and latenight comics, yet which take on a different hue upon closer inspection. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:22 am by Joe Consumer
The memorable case that provides the title -- a woman who sued McDonald's after being scalded by its coffee -- is only one of several that served as fodder for both libertarians like John Stossel and latenight comics, yet which take on a different hue upon closer inspection. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:39 pm by Ilya Somin
By all accounts, John Yoo was and is a true believer in nearly unlimited wartime executive power. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This type of provision is common to extradition treaties; the power to make such decisions is assigned to the executive branch. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:06 am by Zoe Tillman
When the conversation turned to the court’s response to national security issues, Abrams, who famously defended the New York Times in the Pentagon Papers case, said he thinks the Roberts court has shown more deference to the executive branch. [read post]