Search for: "May v. Summers"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 4,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2017, 7:08 pm
The inability or unwillingness to accommodate the aspirations of these powers in the future may increasingly cause some states to challenge or even reject current rules and norms. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
” They are Rucho v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
This Act may be cited as the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act”. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
"[V]ery bad…for the law firms that pay them, for the associates who receive them, for the clients who foot the bill for them, and for the society we serve. . . the higher salaries are wasted dollars. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:30 am
Whilst it may be a simple and easily understood measure, it has two main drawbacks. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
As I explain in my article, a week after NAMUDNO was issued, the Court announced it would not be deciding Citizens United by the Court’s summer break as scheduled. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:55 pm
The court characterized these services as medical or medically related within the purview of Public Health Law article 25, title V (Public Health Law § 2580 et seq.). [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
In North Carolina, defendants do not choose post-release supervision; to the contrary, by statute they may not refuse it. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:56 am
They may have wanted the time for themselves. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 3:33 am
Will We See More Pro Marxist/Leftist Riots This Summer From The SCOTUS Decision? [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:05 am
Ohio State: The Battle Continues, Collegehoopsnet.com, Dec. 20, 2007, [www.collegehoopsnet.com] (last visited Feb. 24, 2008). 17 O'Brien v Ohio State Univ., No. 06AP-946, 2007 WL 2729077, at *14 (Ohio Ct. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 7:58 am
I may just pop over there! [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
They may or may not be lawyers. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
Supreme Court ruling from 10 years ago called Hoffman Plastic Compounds Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
The first two of these conditions would seem to be fulfilled, but given the general political condemnation of Salmond and MacAskill for their handling of this issue earlier in the summer, other Westminster parties may be unwilling to make concessions. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:30 am
There, the Court held that ‘the list of ingredients, even though correct and comprehensive, may in some situations not be capable of correcting sufficiently the consumer’s erroneous or misleading impression concerning the characteristics of a foodstuff that stems from the other items comprising its labelling’ (para. 40). [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
As described by the Delaware Supreme Court in its Dieckman v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
At the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Commissioner Caroline Pham or Summer Mersinger could potentially be elevated to replace Chair Rostin Behnam. [read post]
