Search for: "Million v State"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 24,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2016, 2:27 pm
The United States as amicus curiae suggested a test, see Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 27–29, but Samsung and Apple did not brief the issue. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Munoz v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 7:13 am
Related information: Article by Dave Christensen: Michigan auto law update on McCormick v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 4:31 pm
Apotex et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
It consists of more than 1,850 schools and over one million students from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
It consists of more than 1,850 schools and over one million students from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:31 pm
Heyer v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:45 am
More than one million students come to the United States each year on F-1 student visas. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
Blake sentenced Anthony V. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 1:24 pm
Turner v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 3:11 am
He presented a useful recap of the seminal Supreme Court case, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
A few years ago, in Ysbrand v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 2:08 pm
" See United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
The variable VaRp expresses the value at risk given a particular probability of a loss as the product of −zp, standard deviation (σ), and the total value of the portfolio (v): VaRp = −zp · σ · v The negative sign before −zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
The variable VaRp expresses the value at risk given a particular probability of a loss as the product of −zp, standard deviation (σ), and the total value of the portfolio (v): VaRp = −zp · σ · v The negative sign before −zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:17 pm
In Mays v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:01 am
Hodges Trust v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:02 am
In Snyder v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:45 pm
Yet, rare or not, that is precisely the case in Berry v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
Baker are entitled to interest on their $507 million punitive damages award. [read post]
