Search for: "Pass v. State"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 28,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc (572 US ___, 134 S Ct 1377 (2014)),… [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In November 2022, Michigan voters passed a state constitutional amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:42 am
I received an email from a long-standing reader, asking if I could reconcile my opinion that Ohio’s proposed off-duty conduct law would prohibit an Ohio employer from terminating an employee for off-duty marijuana use if Issue 3 [pdf] passes, with the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court in Coates v Dish Network [pdf], which held that Colorado’s off-duty conduct law did not prohibit such a termination despite that state’s legalization of pot. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:00 am
I've written two other posts about Grants Pass v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:59 am
Citing State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:56 am
Cariou v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:48 am
"The bill, which will go into effect Sept. 15, allows abortion only in cases of rape, incest, lethal fetal abnormality or when the procedure is necessary to prevent severe health risks or death.... [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
Chicago officials passed the ordinance last week in response to the Court’s decision in McDonald v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:42 am
[Post by Venkat] Lane v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
R v Albert, 2016 NBQB 154. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
The agencies also stressed that District Courts had found defects in the procedure taken to pass the 2015 rule such that repealing the rule would allow greater regulatory certainty. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:19 pm
The case was filed in the District Court for the District of Maryland on February 18, 2021, entitled Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:19 pm
The case was filed in the District Court for the District of Maryland on February 18, 2021, entitled Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:53 pm
(It passed by a 58% to 42% margin.) [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:30 am
The third states it is a decision of the Court of Appeal in February 2007. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:02 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 9:58 am
In State of Washington v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 9:50 am
Allen v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:58 am
” In 1976 Congress passed the Medical Device Amendments, establishing a national standard with express pre-emption language barring states from imposing their own requirements. [read post]
