Search for: "People v Childs"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 6,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm
The case, People v Hendrickson, stands for the evidentiary proposition that the testimony of the un-married participant in an adulterous union (the "other woman") can supply the requisite testimony to support a conviction, subject of course, to cross examination.In the here and now of 2009, Michigan's family courts have adhered to the "no-fault" provisions of the divorce statutes. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:29 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 1:20 pm
The case, People v Hendrickson, stands for the evidentiary proposition that the testimony of the un-married participant in an adulterous union can supply the requisite evidence to support a conviction.In the here and now of 2009, Michigan's family courts have adhered to the "no-fault" provisions of the divorce statutes. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:30 am
One of those two employees was unsure if the person underneath was a man or a woman, according to the court documents.The case used to illustrate the doctrine in my torts casebook was Yania v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:23 am
The [Family Justice System] depends upon the integrity of the expert witness, and the duties of the expert witness to the child and to the court are spelled out in case law, in the Rules and in the Practice Direction. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:10 pm
Scott v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 7:36 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
Ever since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976's Gregg v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:43 pm
He is wrong about the child labor case of Hammer v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 3:07 pm
[Dealbook] * In the matter of Jon v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:52 am
“We are going to be relentless and determined and focused … They are experts at scaring people, telling them, ‘They’re going to take your guns’ … We need the same level of intensity. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:06 pm
[Chuck Ross, The Federalist] Kansas school-finance suit tests whether litigators can end-run elected officials on taxes and spending [WSJ, compare Colorado] Lenore Skenazy (who’ll speak at Cato Mar. 6) on the Wellesley “Sleepwalker” sculpture flap: “Once we equate making people feel bad with actually attacking them, free expression is basically obsolete” [WSJ] “School Found Liable After Child Sneaks Onto Roof And Falls” [Erik… [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
Professor Oh also discusses the key Supreme Court precedent from 1898, U.S. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 2:26 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:56 am
In State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 2:24 pm
Lalonde v. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 5:51 am
People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 5:15 pm
The case, People v Hendrickson, stands for the evidentiary proposition that the testimony of the un-married participant in an adulterous union can supply the requisite evidence to support a conviction.In the here and now of 2009, Michigan's family courts have adhered to the "no-fault" provisions of the divorce statutes. [read post]
