Search for: "People v Word" Results 3921 - 3940 of 17,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2014, 8:17 am by Burt Neuborne
As the Court’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am by Paul Smith and Adav Noti
In other words, these 538 people will be, for a short time, the most important elected officials in the nation. [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:01 am
Surely it is a code word, but for what? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
But they do not seek to ban people from taking photos for their own pleasure. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:27 pm by Jeffrey D. Polsky
There’s a sex harassment case playing out in federal court in New York – Marchuk v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:54 pm by Bill Otis
The Times says, picking through the oral argument in Plata v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:08 pm by Simon Gibbs
However, this might have been worded more clearly. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 11:18 am by Steve Vladeck
In her contribution to this symposium, Leah Litman writes that “it’s likely we’ve already heard the court’s last and only words (which were no words at all) on the merits [of the travel ban] . [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
MARQUES, the European trade marks organisation, applied to register the words CLASS 46 as a trade mark, thus securing the reputation and goodwill in the Class 46 weblog and the application has been published (see here). [read post]