Search for: "People v. Finely"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 5,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 7:48 pm
” We need, he said, housing for people who are working here, people starting families. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:59 pm
Fancaster, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
In less precise terms, the question was, can corporations ban class actions within the fine print of their contracts? [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:53 am
Belgium and Belcacemi and Oussar v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Columbia Sportswear successful in reducing counterfeits in China (IP Dragon) Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court orders New Apple Concept Technology to pay Apple 400,000 Yuan in damages for trade mark infringement and unfair competition (DeBund) 2386 IPR cases dealt with by Culture Administrations in Q3 (DeBund) Well-known trade marks can be recognised on basis of the products’ sales volumes (DeBund) Judicial Criteria for copyright cases (part 2) (DeBund)… [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
The rule was designed to address concerns that people who were otherwise prohibited from obtaining firearms could readily obtain parts that they could rapidly assemble into firearms. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
For people on both sides of the class action bar, denial in these two cases represents a big missed opportunity to provide additional clarity on recurring issues. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am
They exercised it, he relied on it, served a substantial suspension, paid a substantial fine, and his rights are now vested. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In this regard, Jill Lepore’s fine discussion of Adkins should be compared to David Bernstein’s. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court will review Barr v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
In People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Before the people of Florida adopted Amendment 4 and the legislature passed Section 0751, there was no doubt that the state could lawfully impose such fines, fees, costs, and restitution obligations. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:22 am
Democrats can do that just fine, too. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:41 am
One recent example is the case of Ash v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm
Ohio Elections Comm’n); and anonymously sign people up for petitions (1999’s Buckley v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 5:50 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
