Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 4,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person shall be strictly liable for a violation of this subsection upon proof of a violation of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:29-2 or while operating a motor vehicle in violation of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:20-10 which resulted in bodily injury to another person; or (7) Attempts to cause significant bodily injury to another or causes significant bodily injury purposely or knowingly or, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to… [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
However, Loughlin immediately proceeds to define the word “constitutionalism” in a very particular way, rendering it almost a term of art. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:01 pm
.: Limited 1 March 2022 Original: English 22-02912 (E) Afghanistan, Albania, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Belgium, Belize, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana,… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
Perform is defined as to ‘recite, render, play, dance or act’ a work ‘directly or by means of any device or processor in the case of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to show its images in any sequence or to make the sounds accompanying it audible’. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
States have justified their constitutional critiques of federal actions by claiming for themselves the role of representatives of the American people, or at least, a considerable proportion of that people. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:47 am
Promete una participación más amplia en decisiones ambientales y el acceso a la justicia para víctimas de daños ambientales. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:55 am
Weight Watchers Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am
Even actual “speakers” rarely get more than 8 minutes, unless they are very prominent people such as judges or senior government or WIPO people speaking on very important topics. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:43 pm
Entertainment 20002, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In NFIB v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 8:04 am
’” APHA v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
In Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:26 am
First on this Kat’s platter for the day is the decision in Schütz v Werit [2011] EWCA Civ 303. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
This narrow reading rendered the Clause effectively meaningless. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:35 pm
Š. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
In Monroe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Shiv Sidharth v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:26 am
In Mathews v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:55 pm
Alito’s opinion hewed closely to the excessive force precedent of Graham v. [read post]
