Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 3921 - 3940 of 178,381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
Here’s an excerpt: Two potential approaches have been recently identified by former SEC Chair Jay Clayton and former Commissioner Joseph A. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by John Jenkins
.; 2/24), Chancellor McCormick refused to dismiss a plaintiffs claims that the Activision Blizzard board of directors “violated multiple provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) governing board negotiation and board and stockholder approval of merger agreements” when it authorized the company’s merger agreement […] [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:51 pm by MEL
Consequently, the plaintiff, who was terminated partway through a fixed-term contract, was awarded damages equating to the remainder of the contract term—101 weeks or $157,071.57. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:51 pm by MEL
Consequently, the plaintiff, who was terminated partway through a fixed-term contract, was awarded damages equating to the remainder of the contract term—101 weeks or $157,071.57. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm by Richard Hunt
Then, after citing to the “preponderance of the evidence” standard the Court reviews the plaintiffs claims and concludes that the plaintiff “was denied effective communication” and has standing to sue. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm by Richard Hunt
Then, after citing to the “preponderance of the evidence” standard the Court reviews the plaintiffs claims and concludes that the plaintiff “was denied effective communication” and has standing to sue. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:17 pm by Arfaa Law Group
The case alleged that the defendant radiologist failed to appropriately evaluate, treat, and report the plaintiffs medical condition, leading to a devastating progression from stage I to stage IV cancer. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:43 pm
  A recent detour to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated that decision in light of the new rule, but also remanded the case to determine whether the 2024 rule itself complies with the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (as the plaintiffs now claim). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
Upholding the arguments of the plaintiff, the court emphasised that “the combination of different bodywork elements representing a "raging" bull reveals arbitrary aesthetic choices by the author and is not the result of an obligation dictated by the vehicle's function”. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 1:59 pm by Jack Bogdanski
One of the plaintiffs' lawyers inadvertently handed over to an Oregonian reporter, Matthew Kish, some documents that the court had sealed in the case. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 1:52 pm by Flaxman Law Group
Let’s talk about your potential claim and how we may be able to help. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
As a result, a patient’s failure to recognize a medication error may bar a damages award. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:47 am by Sidney Schupak, Esq.
In addition to proving causation, a successful plaintiff must also show that the defendant owed them a duty of care, breached that duty, and that the plaintiff suffered harm for which a damages award could provide redress. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:45 am by Sidney Schupak, Esq.
For example, if two defendants are equally responsible for the plaintiffs injuries, but one cannot pay 50% of the damages award, the plaintiff can collect 100% of the damages award from the other defendant. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:42 am by Burton A. Padove
Plaintiffs must prove their case by the preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely than not that the defendant’s negligence led to the plaintiffs injury. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:27 am by Stephen Rosenberg
I have somehow managed to escape the trap many litigators find themselves in, of being almost exclusively a plaintiffs lawyer or instead a defense lawyer. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:54 am by Evan Brown
In light of Nvidia’s claim that this constituted clear consent to arbitrate disputes, the court examined whether this agreement was conscionable and whether it indeed covered the plaintiffs’ claims. [read post]