Search for: "President v. State"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 22,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
At the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen looks at the big picture, with brief previews of the issues that could affect states, while Adam Liptak of The New York Times previews Holt v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:46 am
United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
As Chief Justice Marshall famously explained in Marbury v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:28 pm
As Chief Justice Marshall famously explained in Marbury v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
United States (23-726) and Idaho v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
Tejada: "President Barack Obama was "fully aware" of the project. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:03 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:45 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm
President and Fellows of Harvard College, Dobbs v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:05 pm
The EACJ followed the reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights (Goodwin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 4:14 pm
As promised in his 2014 State of the Union Address, President Obama has turned to executive action to advance his agenda, which includes increasing the minimum wage and creating improved tools to ensure equal pay for women and minorities. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 10:05 am
Supreme Court in AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Noel Canning 12-1281Issue: (1) Whether the President’s recess-appointment power may be exercised during a recess that occurs within a session of the Senate, or is instead limited to recesses that occur between enumerated sessions of the Senate, and (2) whether the President’s recess-appointment power may be exercised to fill vacancies that exist during a recess, or is instead limited to vacancies that first arose during that recess. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
Shaw was presiding over the investigation.The apparent reason for which this reassignment occurred is that ALJ Moore started in his new role last month, and the ITC is now assigning a mix of new and previously-pending matters to him.When I saw the date of his appointment, I was--only for a moment--puzzled. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:32 pm
Supreme Court case, Shearson/American Express v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Curtis Joyner's 10-page opinion in Holsworth v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Hildebrandt (1916), Smiley v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:22 am
The union president states that the purpose of the blog was to communicate to the union membership, particularly in light of the ongoing negotiations. [read post]
