Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 3921 - 3940 of 30,054
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2024, 1:23 pm by Maurice W. McLaughlin
  The United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently examined the standard employees must meet to prove pregnancy discrimination and disability discrimination in the case of Peifer v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6 [e] [2]). [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm by Matthew Nied
Because no such requirement exists in Canada, plaintiffs may enjoy a juridical advantage by pursuing their defamation claims in Canada rather than in the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Simon Fodden
District Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINACERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 12–138. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:02 am
  But it -- like the other Ninth Circuit opinion this morning -- contains a new "Summary" section that looks very much like the "Syllabus" in opinions of the United States Suprme Court. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:52 pm by Donna Bader
  Justice Klein also notes that California has aligned itself with the minority view in the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Mungovan, UNITED STATES: HEDGE FUND DUE DILIGENCE: A US LITIGATOR'S PERSPECTIVE, Mondaq Article ID: 48320***Jennifer L. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:09 am by Michelle O'Neil
The United States Supreme Court has moved a giant leap forward in LGBTQ+ rights with the latest opinion in Bostock v. [read post]