Search for: "S. et al" Results 3921 - 3940 of 29,073
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Many people do not immediately recognize the civil legal dimensions of their problem(s). [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 11:55 am by William Sinclair
Richard Buckingham, et al., the Court answered the following two certified questions from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland: (1) whether changing beneficiaries on a life insurance policy constitutes a conveyance under the Maryland Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act; and (2) whether a guardian of property has the authority to change beneficiaries for a life insurance policy of the ward. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 6:01 am by Steve Lubet
All five co-authors of the Adamson et al. paper list one or both of these institutions as their academic affiliation(s). [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Limoges, 2021 QCCQ 1874 PROFESSIONS : Les défendeurs — Maison Jacynthe inc., Actumus inc. et un naturopathe — sont déclarés coupables d’avoir agi de manière à donner lieu de croire qu’ils étaient autorisés à exercer la médecine, en violation de l’article 32 C.prof. 2021EXP-1001 Juridiction : Cour du Québec, Chambre criminelle et pénale (C.Q.),… [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 1:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Id.; see also Shapiro et al., Supreme Court Practice § 17.13(d)(12), p. 17-45 (11th ed. 2019) (noting cases where the Court has denied injunctive relief in light of a "change in circumstances or an anticipated change in circumstances"). [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:30 pm by Unknown
" Links to previous posts are provided in the footnotes.The BIA's Mansplaining of Gender-Based Asylum (Jeffrey S. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:14 am by Richard Hunt
Feasibility and cost Bronx Independent Living Services et al v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:20 pm
Gomulkiewicz et al., Licensing Intellectual Property: Law and Application 4 (2d ed. 2011). [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:43 am by Jihee Ahn
 Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991), but advised that its grant of authority for that particular deposition should not be considered precedent, and China has not permitted a deposition since. [read post]